


Colonial
Dog Show
A
Discussion of Dogs in Art and History![]()
Have
you ever walked through a museum and noticed that many portraits include
four-legged side kicks? From prehistoric rock art to royal
Renaissance portraiture, dogs and humans in art are a combination that will
endure for as long as the species survive. The trend was especially
popular in the 17th and 18th centuries. In fact, one of the portraits in
the Hammond-Harwood House shows an elegant lady holding a petite
spaniel--probably a King Charles Spaniel. This portrait was painted around 1720
and is attributed to R. Dellor, an artist from the Kneller school. The
image depicts Margaret Frances Townley Chase, a grandmother of one of the owners
of the Hammond-Harwood House. Why was Mrs. Chase pictured holding her toy
companion? The presence of the dog obviously points to her love for the
animal. According to one 16th century source, such small dogs
“were chiefly sought after for the amusement and pleasure of women.
The smaller the kind the more pleasing it is, so that they may carry them
in their bosoms, in their, beds, and in their arms, and in their carriages.
[These] kinds of dogs are altogether useless for any other purposes,
except that they ease the pain of the stomach, being often applied to it, or
frequently born of the bosom of the diseased person, by the moderation of their
vital heat.” Lap dogs, like the tiny
spaniels, also served the practical function of keeping fleas at bay--at least
while the dog was present fleas were more interested in it than in their human
hosts. In an age when the plague was a constant threat, dogs were life
savers. Still, it was believed that dogs “with no practical
function” were the ultimate expressions of luxury and affluence.
Is
there anything else that the presence of these pets tell us? With an
unbreakable bond to his master, a dog frequently
symbolized loyalty. Thus, the dog sitting in Mrs. Chase’s lap reasserts
her loyalty to her husband.
Indeed, the griffin terrier pictured in the famous van Eyck marriage
portrait the Arnolfini
Wedding seems to embody the couple’s undying affection and
fidelity to each other. (Although some
scholars argue that the dog in this image represents carnal desire). If a
dog were featured with a widow, that dog might represent the widow’s loyalty
to her husband’s memory. In
the same sense, Kings and Princes were often pictured with large,
powerful dogs as conspicuous symbols of their own strength and vitality.
In Sir Anthony van Dyck's image of the Children of Charles I, a giant
mastiff yields to the future King of England.
Sometimes, the
presence of a dog in a portrait revealed nothing more than the sitter's absolute
adoration for his pet.
During the
Revolutionary War, Peale served as an officer in the Continental Army.
Years later, the Peale’s home became a kind of soup kitchen and shelter
for wandering soldiers. In
gratitude for the Peale’s hospitality, one penniless soldier pulled a tiny
puppy from under his coat and presented it to the family.
The veteran vowed that the pup would guard the family until its death.
It was said that one day when Peale was shopping at the Annapolis market,
a thief ran away with his basket, and the dog hunted the thief down and held him
at bay until the basket was recovered by its rightful owner.
This was all done amidst a
crowd of cheering citizens. This
brave dog was named Argus, after the greyhound in Homer’s epic tale The
Odyssey, and he was so loved
that in the first decade of the 19th century, Charles Willson Peale painted the
pointer mix into the foreground of any existing family portrait. Understandably, when Argus died, Peale wrote a touching elegy
in honor of his friend:
Since
first began his watchful cares,
Their
wanted course have run.
We
found him in a soldier’s arms,
who
weak and feeble asked alms,
and
gave him in return.
A special thank-you to everyone who participated in the Colonial Dog Show at the Hammond-Harwood House ! Look for it again soon!